Contents
Key takeaways
- For a borrowing benefit the goal isn’t a high sign-up rate, it’s that everyone knows the option exists and feels free to ignore it.
- Keep FCAC’s basics like plain language, trusted channels and clear next steps, but leave out incentives, participation targets and social-proof messages.
- Give managers a short script and clear limits, and make sure they never ask anyone whether they’ve applied or borrowed.
- Don’t announce the benefit alongside reduced hours or a delayed pay run, and mention other support in the same message.
- Measure whether employees know and understand the benefit, never who applied, who borrowed or how much.
Most advice on promoting workplace wellness programs is about getting more people to sign up. Champions, reminders, incentives, a bit of friendly competition. For a budgeting workshop or a savings challenge, that makes sense.
A benefit that involves borrowing is different, because a high sign-up rate isn’t the goal. What you want is for every employee to know the option exists, understand it well enough to decide, and feel completely free to ignore it. Getting there takes a slightly different approach.
What does good wellness communication already get right?
The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada has guidance on communicating a workplace financial wellness program, and a lot of it carries over well:
- Use plain, positive language that makes sense to your employees.
- Use channels people already trust, like orientation, staff meetings, newsletters and noticeboards, and repeat the message across them.
- Make it clear how to get access, with simple next steps.
- Target the message to where people are, instead of sending one generic blast.
Keep all of that. With frontline and shift-based teams especially, the trusted channel is often the break-room noticeboard, a shift huddle or a printed sheet in the pay envelope, more than the intranet.
Where a borrowing benefit needs different handling
FCAC’s guidance also suggests rewards, games and messages that promote what others are doing, like “8 out of 10 employees are participating.” Those work when the behaviour you’re encouraging is good for nearly everyone, like learning to budget.
Borrowing isn’t like that. A loan can be a good decision for one person and a bad one for someone else. So for an emergency-loan benefit we’d leave these out completely (this is our own view, not FCAC’s):
- No incentives or prizes for applying.
- No participation targets for HR, managers or sites.
- No social-proof messages about how many colleagues use it. Leaving those out also means you never have to collect or share that kind of information.
- No reminders aimed at individuals. A general reminder to everyone is fine. Asking one person whether they’ve looked at Buffer yet is not.
Which words help, and which backfire?
The wording around a borrowing benefit shapes whether people feel judged, pushed or misled. A few swaps:
| Instead of | Try | Why |
|---|---|---|
| “Struggling with money? We can help.” | “Unexpected costs happen to everyone. Here’s one option if you ever need it.” | Doesn’t imply the reader is in trouble |
| “Get the cash you need, fast.” | “A small, structured loan for emergencies, with a set repayment schedule.” | Describes the product instead of selling urgency |
| “Everyone’s approved.” or “No credit check!” | “Approval isn’t guaranteed. There’s no hard credit inquiry.” | Accurate, and doesn’t mix the two up |
| “It’s free.” | “It costs [Employer] nothing. If you borrow, you’ll repay the loan, and interest may apply under the loan terms.” | Keeps employer cost and borrower cost separate |
| “Take control of your finances!” | “If it’s useful, it’s there. If not, ignore it.” | Takes out the pressure and the moral tone |
| “Your manager can tell you more.” | “Questions go to [provider], not your manager.” | Protects privacy and the working relationship |
Whatever you write, every product claim should match what the provider has confirmed in writing.
A two-minute script for managers
Managers are often the most trusted channel for frontline teams. They’re also the riskiest, because they control schedules. Give them a short script and clear limits.
“Quick one before we start. The company now offers access to [benefit], which is a way to get a small emergency loan if something unexpected comes up. It’s completely optional. It’s run by [provider], not by us, so if you have questions, the details are on [noticeboard/link], or you can contact them directly. I won’t know who uses it, and I won’t be asking.”
Only include the “I won’t know” line if it’s true for your arrangement, and confirm that with your provider first.
Then spell out the limits for managers:
- Don’t ask anyone whether they’ve applied or borrowed.
- Don’t suggest the benefit to a specific person, even kindly. If someone brings up a money problem, point them to the general resources everyone gets, including your employee assistance program if you have one.
- Don’t connect the benefit to performance, scheduling or attendance conversations.
Does timing matter?
More than you’d think. Announcing an emergency-loan option the same week as reduced hours or a delayed pay run can read as borrow to cover what we just took away. Separate those moments where you can, and be honest when you can’t.
A borrowing benefit should also sit next to other support. If you offer financial counselling through an EAP, or you’re working on schedule predictability or pay timing, mention it in the same message. It tells people the loan is one option among several and not the company’s whole answer.
What should you measure?
You’ll want to know whether the communication worked. It’s reasonable to track whether employees know the benefit exists and understand it, for example with a short anonymous pulse question. It’s not reasonable to track who applied, who borrowed or how much, at any level where an individual could be identified.
Be careful with promises in both directions. Don’t tell leadership the benefit will reduce absenteeism or turnover, because the evidence doesn’t support that. And don’t tell employees it will fix their finances.
A quick check before you send anything
- Every product claim matches the provider’s written terms.
- Somewhere in the message, it says approval isn’t guaranteed and that borrowing means repaying.
- Employer cost and borrower cost are kept separate.
- Questions go to the provider, not managers.
- There are no incentives, targets or social-proof messages.
- Other support (EAP, counselling, other benefits) gets a mention too.
Questions and answers
Should we offer incentives to get employees to sign up?
We’d leave them out. Rewards, games and social proof work when the behaviour is good for nearly everyone, like learning to budget. A loan can be a good decision for one person and a bad one for someone else. That’s our own view, not FCAC’s.
What should managers say about the benefit?
Keep it short. Mention that it exists, that it’s optional, that it’s run by the provider and where the details are, and send questions to the provider. Only include a line saying they won’t know who uses it if that’s true for your arrangement, and confirm it with your provider first.
What can we measure without overstepping?
It’s reasonable to track whether employees know the benefit exists and understand it, for example with a short anonymous pulse question. It’s not reasonable to track who applied, who borrowed or how much, at any level where an individual could be identified.
Does timing matter when announcing a loan benefit?
Yes. Announcing it the same week as reduced hours or a delayed pay run can read as borrow to cover what we just took away. Separate those moments where you can, and mention other support like EAP counselling in the same message.
Sources and references
- Communicate your financial wellness program · Financial Consumer Agency of Canada
Product facts in this article were supplied by Buffer Financial Inc. This article is general information, not personal financial advice or an offer of credit.




